Lesson · Logic & problem solving
Problem first, prompt second
Students solve a real problem on paper using a four-step method, estimate the answer, and then perform an “autopsy” on an AI solution that sounds right but isn’t.
The big idea
If you can’t estimate the answer, you can’t tell when a machine gets it wrong.
Students will be able to, without AI:
- Use a four-step problem-solving method
- Estimate before calculating
- Find and explain an error in a confident-sounding solution
- Explain a solution so a younger student could follow it
Lesson flow · the 5 P’s
Think first. Then the tool.
Most of the lesson happens on paper. AI appears for one short, structured phase, and the teacher can run it from a single projector screen. How the 5 P’s work →
Ponder
12 min○ Screens off · paper onlyStudents meet the problem with pencils only. They use George Pólya’s classic four steps from How to Solve It (1945): understand, plan, solve, look back.
- The problem: A school has 600 students. Three-quarters ride the bus. Each bus holds 54 students. How many buses does the school need?
- Understand: What do you know? What are you asked? Circle the trap words.
- Estimate: Before calculating, about how many buses? Write it down.
- Solve: Work it out on paper.
- Look back: Does your answer make sense in the real world?
Plan
5 min○ Screens off · paper onlyStudents write what a correct answer must look like before seeing the AI’s.
- A correct answer must be about ___ because ___.
- List one mistake you think is easy to make here.
Partner
8 min● AI on · teacher screen or labStudents receive an AI-written solution (printed on the worksheet, or shown by the teacher). It is fluent, confident and wrong.
- Optional: on the teacher’s screen, ask a current AI the same problem and compare. (Today’s AI often gets this right. That’s fine: the skill is checking.)
Probe
12 min○ Screens off · paper onlyScreens off. Students do an answer autopsy.
- Check each step. Which steps are correct?
- Find the error. (8 buses only carry 432 students, leaving 18 behind. You must round up to 9.)
- Compare the AI’s answer with your estimate. Would your estimate have caught it?
- Write the rule the AI broke in your own words.
Prove
8 min○ Screens off · paper onlyStudents show they own the skill without any help.
- Solve the twin problem on the worksheet with no help.
- Explain the bus problem so a 5th grader could understand it.
- Exit ticket: “The best way to check an AI’s math is…”
- Teacher key (twin problem): 920 ÷ 15 = 61.33, so 62 vans. 61 vans carry only 915 people and leave 5 behind.
Printable
Student worksheet
Print one per student. Everything students hand in is handwritten, so their thinking is visible.
Answer autopsy
Solve it yourself first. Then check the AI.
Assessment
Grade the thinking, not the output
Every row scores something students did themselves. An AI can produce a product; it can’t produce a student’s reasons.
| Criteria | 4 · Excellent | 3 · Solid | 2 · Developing | 1 · Beginning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Understanding & estimate | Identifies key info and a reasonable estimate with reasoning | Reasonable estimate | Estimate off or unexplained | No estimate |
| Own solution | Correct with clear steps and correct rounding | Correct with minor gaps | Partially correct | Incorrect |
| Answer autopsy | Finds the error, explains why it matters in the real world | Finds the error | Senses something wrong but can’t locate it | Accepts the AI answer |
| Explanation | A younger student could follow it | Mostly clear | Confusing in parts | Missing |
Why this is hard to cheat
The AI answer is supplied, so there’s nothing to gain by looking one up. The twin problem and the “explain it to a 5th grader” task are done in class on paper.
Adjust it
Younger students: Use smaller numbers (60 students, buses of 25) and pictures of buses to count.
Older students: Have students write their own “trap” problem and a fluent but wrong AI-style solution for a classmate to autopsy.
No devices at all? Already device-free. The AI solution is printed on the worksheet.
Discussion questions
- Why does a wrong answer feel more believable when it’s written confidently?
- When is a small error dangerous in real life? (Medicine doses, bridge loads, budgets.)
- Should you trust a calculator? An AI? What’s the difference?
- What habits help you catch your own mistakes?
Extensions & connections
- Science version: give an AI-style lab conclusion that ignores a variable and have students find it.
- Connect to how AI can be confidently wrong: how transformers predict words.
- Careers: engineers, pharmacists and accountants all check numbers for a living.
Put curiosity to work
Read it. Try it. Question it.
Explore new AI research, or take a paper-first investigation into your classroom.